Changing Fandoms and Freeforms

[pumpkinkingmod]

Do any participants with fandoms whose AO3 canonical titles don't start with Latin characters want their fandoms changed so that they start with either the transliteration or the English title so that they appear in the proper place on the AO3 requests page?

Fic/Art and Tricks/Treats are now all in the relationship section.  They have been combined so that you could theoretically do something like request Trick - Fic and Treat - Art without having to worry about getting the other two.

You may notice that there are now five freeform tags:
-I am interested in extra gifts for the community challenge that don't fit my requests.
-I am not interested in extra gifts for the community challenge that don't fit my requests.
-I am not interested in receiving extra gifts.
-You may ignore my Art/Fic preferences for extra gifts.
-You may ignore my Trick/Treat preferences for extra gifts.

These tags are not going to be used for matching and are an easy way to opt in and out of certain parts of Trick or Treat so that those interested in giving extra gifts know if you are interested in getting them.

"I am interested in extra gifts for the community challenge that don't fit my requests."
This means you are interested in getting extra gifts that fit the community challenge that don't perfectly fit your requests.  It does not give someone permission to ignore your Do Not Wants.

"I am not interested in extra gifts for the community challenge that don't fit my requests."
This means you are only interested in extra gifts that fit what you have in your requests.

"I am not interested in receiving extra gifts."
-This means that you aren't interested in receiving any extra gifts.  You will not be counted towards any goals of getting x number of gifts per participant.  You may still end up getting multiple gifts if multiple participants are assigned to you.

"You may ignore my Art/Fic preferences for extra gifts."
If you requested only one, you are interested in the other for extra gifts as well.  These extra gifts can not be counted as your main gift if your giver defaults.

"You may ignore my Trick/Treat preferences for extra gifts."
If you requested only one, you are interested in the other for extra gifts as well.  These extra gifts can not be counted as your main gift if your giver defaults.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

"I am interested in extra gifts for the community challenge that don't fit my requests."
This means you are interested in getting extra gifts that fit the community challenge that don't perfectly fit your requests. It does not give someone permission to ignore your Do Not Wants.

I don't like this wording in the slightest, and I don't think the do/don't versions of this question should be options unless this is free-for-all permission not to fulfill *any* of the minimum requirements of a person's requests, including DNWs. Otherwise, how does this differ from any other gift or treat I might give/receive? Is the expectation of someone who doesn't check this box that they receive gifts which *exactly* fit their requests, including optional details?

[(Anonymous)]

+1

I'd much rather have "I am opting out of extra gifts" / "I am opting in to extra gifts." They are much clearer and use fewer negatives (the double-negatives get confusing and are easy to misread).

Those combined with the "You may ignore my Art/Fic preferences for extra gifts." / "You may ignore my Trick/Treat preferences for extra gifts." tags should be enough for people to understand when it's ok to deviate from the requests.

[pumpkinkingmod]

Thank you for the feedback.

Is there a better way you can suggest for wording the tag?

It is an entirely optional tag that participants don't have to use if they don't want to. It's only purpose is to express interest from the recipient to potential treaters.

In past years I've noticed that some participants are happy to receive broader than what their optional details specifically state. The intention of the tag was to have an easy way for people to show to treaters that they are interested in something that doesn't perfectly fit what is in their details.

[(Anonymous)]

I really don’t have any other suggestions. I feel like this granularity isn’t necessary since participants are already given the opportunity to opt in/out of extras and extras of unrequested work types. Optional details are already optional, so unless you’re wanting to codify that across the board and require everyone to click it as acknowledgment of that fact, it seems redundant.

[shadowsapiens]

Agreed. The way it reads to me, it’s making ODAO opt in/opt out? I’m not thrilled about that logistically.

[pumpkinkingmod]

Thank you for the feedback.

Is there a better way you can suggest for wording the tag?

It is an entirely optional tag that participants don't have to use if they don't want to. It's only purpose is to express interest from the recipient to potential treaters.

In past years I've noticed that some participants are happy to receive broader than what their optional details specifically state. The intention of the tag was to have an easy way for people to show to treaters that they are interested in something that doesn't perfectly fit what is in their details.

[shadowsapiens]

Yeah, I've seen that feedback before, and I think it's really nice of you to address it and try to accommodate people!

I don't think there's a way to word it that I'd like. I'm on board for an opt-out tag for treats in general, because that's very simple and clear, but I'm opposed to the idea of making optional details non-optional. I think there's a lot of room for mismatched expectations there, depending on how different people will interpret "perfectly fit."

But I'd missed that these tags themselves are optional, so if you go through with them, I can just not use any of them, which works well enough for me.

For clarity's sake, I might rephrase to say either "optional details" or "character", depending on which you mean, since "request" could mean any of that.

I'm also not sure whether the distinction of "for the community challenge" is necessary or helpful - would picking "I am not interested (etc)" still leave someone open to a non-request-matching treat *not* for the community challenge? (aka, just because the treater likes the fandom, or wants to do something nice for the recip, etc.)

[(Anonymous)]

ODAO is fine on an assignment. Going ODAO on a treat (without having been given the ok from the recipient) is super shitty.

[pumpkinkingmod]

Thank you for the feedback.

Is there a better way you can suggest for wording the tag?

It is an entirely optional tag that participants don't have to use if they don't want to. It's only purpose is to express interest from the recipient to potential treaters.

In past years I've noticed that some participants are happy to receive broader than what their optional details specifically state. The intention of the tag was to have an easy way for people to show to treaters that they are interested in something that doesn't perfectly fit what is in their details.

[pumpkinkingmod]

Thank you for the feedback.

Is there a better way you can suggest for wording the tag?

It is an entirely optional tag that participants don't have to use if they don't want to. It's only purpose is to express interest from the recipient to potential treaters.

In past years I've noticed that some participants are happy to receive broader than what their optional details specifically state. The intention of the tag was to have an easy way for people to show to treaters that they are interested in something that doesn't perfectly fit what is in their details.